🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where African descendants are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.